 |








 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I've never had the desire to get any of the Guitar Hero games. I understand the allure, just wasn't my cup of tea. I felt the same way about Rock Band. I'm not sure what the disconnect was, I mean I spend hours killing orcs or humans on Warcraft, sending minions out to do by bidding in Overlord and I like music. So what's the problem? In retrospect I think it was the guitar thing, I never wanted to play the guitar so getting a game where I could pretend to play the guitar just wasn't appealing. I lumped Rock Band into that mindset as well. So what happened yesterday was that my girl and I had time to kill near a Best Buy. This is never a good thing for my wallet. We walked in and she saw the TV displays near the entrance. So I did my standard "We really don't need a new TV and we should really spend our money on the wedding." Well it's true, we don't need one and we should keep saving for the wedding. We walked around a bit and I looked around the Apple section for a iPhone headphone extension so I could use my phone to play music in my girls car. A helpful Best Buy sales guy asked if we needed help and after a bit of explanation he trotted off to see if he could find what I needed. This is where it all went south. Oh boy. I steered us toward the game section, never a good sign. Mr. Helpful BB Sales Guy found us and gave me a pretty good adapter. This is the good part. Of course my girl found the Rock Band display. Side note here, this was a pretty craptacular display. The drum set was broken, the left drum was hanging by it's wires, the wire on one of the drumsticks was wrapped around the stand and one of the guitars was unplugged. This is not something that will sell a game by looks. So I helped her get it started and held the broken drum so she could play a bit. She wanted to try out the guitar so we got that working and I tried out the drums. Hmm. I probably shouldn't have done that. Broken drum and all I had a blast. Five minutes pounding away at a run down, worn out display game brought me back to my teen years where I would hog the Apple IIe at the game store to play Tetris. But we had to leave. We also had to walk past the tower, I really do mean tower, of Rock Band game boxes. Now I would like to blame my girl for us buying it. I really would, but that would be a complete lie and send me to hell forever. What happened was that she said "Why don't we buy it?" I, after thinking on my TV line above, was trying to figure out how I could say "FUCK YEAH!" and not be a complete hypocrite. Then, as is her wont, she saved my bacon. Since she had just got a gift card from work as a bonus she offered to use it. This gift card would pay for the whole thing. I'm only human. I caved. No that isn't true, I dove into the pit of hypocrisy willingly and rolled around in the muck like a satisfied pig. I don't regret it a bit. We played yesterday afternoon and had friends over this evening to play. Fun was had and, even though I failed badly in front of people, I had a smile on my face the whole time. I will probably never be a drummer, but god damn can I pretend. Rock Band has the appeal beyond the guitar, to the singer or drummer to be. The bonus? It really is like Tetris on drums for me. Maybe one day I might really get a drum kit and rock out. Um do drum kits have an Easy Mode? Cuz Medium kicks my ass. Current Mood: excited
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |





 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Daring Fireball:
Regarding Ryan Block Asking Steve Jobs if SIM-Unlocking Apps Will Be Allowed ★ I have to say, I side with Block on this one. Just because the answer is obvious doesn’t mean it wasn’t a fair question. I don’t have a problem with Apple serving as a gatekeeper with approval over all apps, but if that’s the role they want, their policies should be explicit. In the presentation, they only listed things like porno and “malicious” apps as thing that wouldn’t be tolerated. Clearly, something that impedes on their carrier contracts won’t either.
It’s probably a moot point because of the data sandboxing (iPhone apps only have access to their own files, not the files of other apps), but would Amazon be allowed to write an OS X Touch app for buying songs from the Amazon MP3 store? Again, I’m not saying it’s outrageous if the answer is “no”, but if that’s the case, it’s only fair to get it on the record as to whether Apple plans to disallow any app that impedes on an Apple revenue stream. Well I have to strongly disagree with Mr. Gruber here. On the one hand we have Apple not allowing an application that will obviously break exclusivity deals with the cell phone carriers they have partnered with. On the other hand we have, based on the examples you gave, applications that have no basis on deals with Apple directly but on the providers of content. Since there was a pretty obvious demo of AIM on the iPhone I really don't think Apple cares about the apps that compete with it. Especially in these categories. Oh sure Apple won't get the minor revenue if a user gets their music from Amazon. They still have that same music playing on the iPhone or iPod Touch. In fact it makes their platform more attractive and they can sell more hardware. Ok maybe their policy should be more explicit. What will and won't be allowed, although I think they can't be too explicit since it will evolve over time. But the basic fact is that Apple has direct contracts with cell carriers and providing a way to bypass those carries is not going to be something they can legally allow. This is pretty obvious and leads to the quite right derision heaped on Ryan Block's question. If he had actually asked about Amazon (or any third party) music download or video rentals or anything like that I would be in support of him. Even if he asked about more explicit descriptions of what would be allowed for iPhone apps I would be on board. But his question as stated didn't lead to any answer that would even remotely, possibly be anything that wasn't "Er no, der." That is why people are castigating him.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I was going to title this post "Oh my fucking god, if I have to deal with another fucking, brain dead, mouth breathing moron today I just might go buy a gun then stake out the post office tomorrow. Ya know just to give postal workers a better name." but of course that was too long so waste of biomass is what you get. I just read this post from Violent Acres. Strangely, although it talks about some chewed carrot for brains asking about adopting a pet (and please if there is a God he better not get one) it pretty much described my day. Them: So how do I go about putting the encrypted number on this form? Me: Well for all of the forms like that they usually use memory variables or cursors. Check out the function that creates it and do something similar to the way other information is populated in the form. (Translation: we stick shit in places that other things can find them.) 1 hour later Them: I can't seem to get the new information to show up. Me: Did you figure out how the other information was showing up on the form? Them: Yeah, yeah, but I did the same thing and it doesn't work. Me: Ok let me take a look. Uh, ok I see the problem. You didn't add anything new to the cursor where all the other data is coming from. You created a new variable that is local to this procedure. (Translation, you put information into a container that was going to be immediately lost, you might as well have stuffed it down the toilet.) Twenty minutes of explanation and excruciatingly explicit examples later... Me: So you see if you just added a new field to this cursor that all the other information is coming from then you can reference it on the form. Them: Oh yeah, yeah I see now. 45.32 minutes later Them: For some reason this other thing I need to put in isn't being displayed in the form. Me: ... Me: ... Me: Did you add a new field to the cursor? Them: No I didn't want to change how it was currently working I tried to do it this way. Me: ... Current Mood: frustrated
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
There are a couple, well several things I want to say right now. But let us talk about yesterday. Not yesterday as in "the ages of yore" but yesterday as in Sunday. That yesterday. I woke up about six in the morning. It would be nice to say I sprang from bed but it was more of grunt, slouch, shuffle out of bed. Then I went and did some things in the bathroom that I'm fairly sure most of you don't really want me to describe. The one that does, well just kiss off. I charge for that kind of information. Pervert. A quick drive to Manhattan Beach, a nice breakfast, a walk on the pier and then another quick drive back home. Only one of those last statements is truly accurate. Electric Company, you have scarred me for life, "Which one of these things doesn't belong here..." Welcome to the hell that is my life. Anyway getting back on track I watched a movie yesterday. Yes THAT yesterday. "Live Free or Die Hard." Very funny, Justin Long completely sold his character. Oh and my girl and I paused just because of the social commentary, the inanity and occasionally because we were laughing so much. Good, fun view that only lost me with the plane. Oh and don't watch the theatrical release. The unrated one is better. Why? One word. Fuck. Let me repeat that... Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Seriously how can John Mclane not say fuck? Oh I get the can make more money from a PG-13 rating but, and I'm being very serious here, what the fuck? Next movie of the yesterday was "Strictly Ballroom." Now I love "Moulin Rouge" and have heard of the Red Curtain films, but somehow I always stayed away from this one. You know, chick flick stuff. But damn if that movie didn't grab me right away, and if you can get more than five minutes into it and not get the title then you are just dead to me. Dead I say. Still have to see R+J but I'll get there. Now, as anyone that knows me understands, I like to dance. No really I'm serious here. Stop laughing back there or I just might have to pop you one. I don't have any illusions about my skills, or lack there of, but I enjoy it and love watching skilled dancers. I'm not a big fan of reality TV but I have to thank my girl for letting (ok making) me see Benji Schiwmmer and Heidi Groskreutz doing the, well, the most awesome and jaw dropping swing dance I have ever seen. I will probably never see the like of that again. So yes, I do want to dance in the Pan-Pacific Grand Prix with my girl even if we do "novel steps." Hell I'll even wear the dress. I haven't even heard of the Paso Doble before yesterday but god damn do I want to dance it at our wedding reception. The last movie of the yesterday that was the day before is "The Full Monty." This is one I've been meaning to see for a while. Good reviews, everyone liked it, just never actually pulled the trigger on it. All I have to say is my loss. Ok I lied I have more to say so just suck it up and keep reading. There is just so something raw about a man that has lost everything. His drive to support his family, his wife, his dog and cat. When he can't even buy nosh for the gerbile in the cage he feels like the ulitmate failure. This movie is not about that. Ok well it is. Only it isn't just sophomoric pretentious angst, it just people. Doing what people do to live, survive and... Well ok crap. I swore I wouldn't do this... I wouldn't... but damn can't fight the sophomoric agnst... dragging me in... must... gasp... my... last... breath. Ok where was I? Right people. Well guys in this case, mostly, but there are some moments (my girl had to point most of them out) that truly show why men and women put up with each other. Even, dare I say, love each other. Oh and there is dancing and a really good soundtrack. Actually it was kinda weird. I came out of watching it loving women more. Oh yes their snide smiles, the shocked looks, the disparaging glances (you will know what scene I'm talking about if you have watched it) might be a put off. But as a member of the audience, oh and a guy, I just thought it was bloody cute. If I can make my girl laugh by shaking my ass or twirling my tackle about and being silly well then hell yeah I'm going there. But the thing that really got me, was their expressions. I don't know if they were random women brought off the street or experienced actors. Either way just brilliant. So yeah. Yesterday was a pretty good day. P.S. No they don't keep their hats on. Current Mood: pleased
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Found this link from Jane Espenson's blog. Man are there a lot of 's'es in her name. Or should I write that as essess, or esses. Hmm well moving right along. Ms. Espenson linked to the Cash for the Crew site which seems to be encouraging people to donate to the Motion Picture and Television Fund's Work Stoppage and Relief Fund. I know there are more "fund" words in the previous sentence than I'm quite comfortable with, but the gist is that Cash for the Crew seems to be setting up a raffle for autographed scripts for everyone that donates to the MPTFWSRF. Ok that acronym was bad but I couldn't resist. The long and the short of it is that actors, writers and producers are a small fraction of the people that work to make television shows and movies. The majority work on building sets, making costumes, putting lights in just the right places, making sure that there is film in the camera, focusing that camera, ensuring that the right people are in the right place, getting coffee, making food, putting makeup on, taking makeup off, ensuring people have toilets to use, keeping power going against all odds... Basically the thousands of names that flash by after a TV show or Movie that few people even bother to read and the names the never even appear. I know that six big corporations not wanting to pay writers and hurting the lively hood of hundreds of thousands of people seems small potatoes when there are atrocities, starvation and war over most of the globe. However if you are in the US and have anything to spare after giving to the other causes, well give them a look see.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
This is the first actual competitor to the iTunes Music Store (iTMS) that I have seen. Quick background, if you have an iPod you use iTunes to sync your music with it. Ok yes there are other clients out there that will get music on the iPod but the vast majority of iPod users use iTunes. Every piece of music I've purchased over the last 3+ years has been through the iTMS. Why? Because it's simple, convenient and did I mention it's simple? Click a button the music downloads and syncs to my iPod. To quote Steve Jobs "Bam!" Now I will mention the downside to the iTMS, namely DRM. Until about a year or so ago I burned out all my purchases to CD and then imported them back so I could have MP3 files. I wasn't really worried about losing authorization as I was about my iPod dying and being able to play them on other things. Of course this was not so "Bam!" The reason I stopped doing the burn/rip/import thing was that I finally got my music on a backup schedule. Oh and I got really lazy about popping CDs in and out of my computer. Enter the Amazon MP3 store. They are offering 256kbs VBR (Variable Bit Rate) MP3 files. Which in layman's terms means that they don't have DRM restrictions and they are about as high quality as MP3s can be. Ok my bad, in true layman's terms you can play them on anything that can handle an MP3 file. If you don't know what an MP3 file is then you are not a layman, maybe a hermit in a cave so what the hell are you doing reading LJ? I decided to test out their store last night. Going in I knew I had to download a client to get full albums so I did that. Now I was faced with a choice, what album do I want to download? "The Slim Shady"* it is so I click on the link. Then had to double click the file it downloaded. Then I had to click ok to the dialog that asked if I really wanted to open the file with Amazon's download client. To be fair Amazon's instructions describe the last step and it is a security feature of Mac OS X. It still was annoying. After that though, pure astonishment. The Amazon client imported the MP3 files into my iTunes library which then synced perfectly with my iPod. Files that I don't have to export to CD and then import. Files which will play on any computer I might own. Joy. While it isn't as seamless as iTMS it's still very good and in many cases cheaper. Mr. Gruber made some good points about pricing and availability of various tracks and albums. The short story is that the iTMS has more total music but Amazon's MP3 Store has some things that iTMS doesn't. From my quick survey Amazon's store is also cheaper, in general, on a per album basis. Overall I will be looking to download music from Amazon MP3 over iTMS, I just wish they made it easier. Their download client really could, and should, become a HTML music portal just like iTunes. That way on the Mac, PC or Linux they could provide a way to easily search for music and download it to the users preferred location. I like the idea of a general web interface, that means that I can find whatever they have on pretty much anything. But having the option to use a dedicated client, especially one that can transfer individual songs as well as albums into my preferred music manager would be a great bonus. All in all though a great start. I do have to give some props to Apple and Messer Jobs, if they didn't make the effort to show the RIAA that they knew what they were doing, and then sticking to their guns on pricing and pushing back on DRM, I don't think we would be in this place today. We now have two of the big four music companies selling DRM free music over the intartubes. That is a large step in the right direction. *I picked this one because my girl has it and I figured I should buy it if I wanted to listen, "guilt free", to the songs. Ok I lie, I just wanted it. The very odd thing was that the "ZOMG explicit" version was cheaper than the censored version. By about a $1.50 if I remember right.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Well after my last post I started seeing more of the whinging and moaning about the iPhone price cut. A whole lot more. In one thread I posted this: To all those that are out side of the 2 week window, refund or rebate, I have one question, "Have you been satisfied with the iPhone before you heard of the price drop?" If yes then it was obviously a good value to you at the price. Complaining about it now is just regret that you didn't wait couple of months to buy one. But if it suited your needs successfully in the interim I just don't see the need for outrage. Any, I mean any, electronics purchase will be fraught with this peril. There is always the danger that a better and/or cheaper model will come out or that there will be a price reduction.
If you answered no to the question, well then I'm sorry you purchased a device that wasn't up to your expectations or didn't suit your needs. But then I saw this post thanks to John Gruber of daringfireball.net. There really is something to this argument, "I paid a gagillion-bagillion dollars for this thing to be special and unique and NOW the plebians can all pick one up. Dammit who do I sue?" It really reminds me of my brother getting so mad when Siouxsie and the Banshees became popular with "Peek-a-Boo". Actually mad may be a bit of an understatement, pissed the fuck off is more correct. At the time I didn't understand it, why would you be upset that a band you like is getting popular and actually making more money? Really why? Later on I realized that it wasn't about the bands worth, it was about the fact that a good band was only know to the select few, the in the know, the elite if you will. Now that they were on the Top-40 stations all "street cred" from knowing them back in the day was lost. Oh some could sneer and look down their noses saying "I saw them back in 1845 and bought a burlap t-shirt!" But the exclusivity was largely gone. And so it is now, anyone that can afford to buy an iPod, well the iPod Touch anyway, can get an iPhone instead. Oh the humanity. P.S. Just because I haven't seen it mentioned by anyone other than myself and wanted to call dibs on it, below is what I wrote prior to the quote above. Anyone else remember the quarterly investor/analyst call Apple had a bit ago? If I recall correctly they spoke of lower margins due to a "product transition". Seems to me the iPod Touch is a pretty major product transition. Not to mention that when you can get the iPod Touch for significantly less than $600 that pretty much meant Apple had to make an aggressive price cut. This is without even taking into account the economics 101 comment I made above. With it, this looks like a pretty well planed product roll out by Apple. It also helps throw into light the lack of a SDK for the iPhone. They didn't have one device but two they were developing that might need it.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
If you have no interest in iPods, Zunes, teh Apples and self justifying behavior then mosey on along then. I am constantly amused at the lengths people will go to to justify the things they buy and are attached to. Probably because at one point in time I was a big evangelist of the Macintosh computer. In the words of bynkii I was a MacMac. So after viewing the various postings about the Apple Event today I was surprised to come across this blog and comments. Reading through the post it is pretty fair. The comments for the most part are also pretty low on the noise to signal ratio. Oh there are a couple that are flame bait, but for the most part they are disappointed in the failed potential of the Zune. Quite frankly this had me pretty shocked. So I endured the login process and posted the quoted lines at the end of this post. And then discovered that it had to be approved by moderators. Oh well. I'm posting this here not to be snarky but to preserve what I said in some form. Plus to provide a bit of context so I don't have to answer things repeatedly. First of all I do own an iPod. A 4G (i think, that is the last monochrome iPod yes) that I've been very happy with. I've also purchased an orignal iPod Nano and a 5.5G iPod for my fiancee. No not at the same time. I've also helped several people recover from some weird iTunes madness. I salivated over the iPhone when it was first announced however I didn't buy one. Even if price was no object it just didn't solve anything I needed it to. My 4G iPod is fine. Everything else was just extra for $600. Ok if price was no object I would have bought two and taken one of them apart, but still. I read the reports on Apple's event today and I have to say I'm a bit more close to buying an iPhone or an iPod Touch. But not enough closer to actually pay for one. The iPod Classic 160GB is tempting... no... must resist! All this to put the following into context. Ok apart from one or two people commenting most of you seem to be doing some valid comparisons between the existing Zune and the new iPods.
I'm really trying to figure out what the issue really is with Apple's Media Event today. Yes they announced some very sexy hardware that will be selling today or in the next month. Yes they have a iPod touch that is basically an iPhone without the phone, speaker, Google Maps, Mail, and some other things that I haven't figured out. Oh and now there seems to be one iPhone model, the 8GB for $400 and the 4GB seems to be discontinued once they sell all of them for $300.
My questions are:
Are you happy with your Zune? Does it do what you expected it to when you bought it?
If the answer is yes then what is the problem? If the answer is no then I'm sorry. If the answer is that it doesn't do what you hoped it would do after updates... well I'm sure you can commiserate with some iPhone buyers that are complaining about the price drop.
Beyond that, wishing that Microsoft would do something is about as effective as wishing Apple would do something. Oh we all want a tweak to this or that, but each company is going to do what they want to in the end.
In both cases buying a product from a company for what it might do in the future is pretty damn silly. Buy something for what it does. If you get added features in the future then bonus. Just don't expect them.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|
 |